Our Innovation – FUE In Chinese Population

Pioneering FUE Hair Transplant Adaptation for Asian Hair: A 16-Year Journey of Innovation

20 Years of Expertise : Every Step Performed in Hong Kong By Doctors

Recognized Pioneer in FUE in Asia

Our early application of the European FUE techniques revealed significant limitations. The protocols were designed for Caucasian hair follicles, which differ markedly from the thicker, often curlier follicular structure and denser scalp tissue of our East Asian patients. This anatomical mismatch led directly to suboptimal clinical outcomes: unacceptably low graft survival rates, poor yield, and dissatisfied patients.

This challenge catalyzed our commitment to innovate. We systematically analyzed these failures, adapted the instrumentation and technique, and documented our findings. As validation of our work and to guide other surgeons, we became the first clinic to publish our adapted methodology for the Chinese population in the ISHRS’s peer-reviewed medical journalHair Transplant Forum International, with our paper “Follicular Unit Extraction: Experience in the Chinese Population.” This publication not only supported our clinical claims but also established a foundational reference for performing FUE in Asian patients.

Sara’s Comment

Our clinic pioneered Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) for East Asian patients, recognizing that European protocols failed on thicker, curlier Asian hair. After pausing services in 2007 to research and adapt, we developed a modified technique. This foundational work evolved into our proprietary FUE-HD method, designed specifically for the anatomical and aesthetic needs of the Chinese population.

Content-index

Is a standard FUE hair transplant suitable for Asian patients?

Not without significant modification. The global FUE technique, developed primarily on Caucasian hair, often yields poor results on Asian patients due to fundamental differences in hair shaft thickness, follicular curvature, and scalp density. A specialized approach is required to ensure high graft survival and natural aesthetics for East Asian patients.

What are the unique challenges of performing FUE on Asian hair?

Asian hair presents distinct anatomical characteristics that complicate standard extraction:

  • Thicker Hair Shafts: Require careful punch size selection to avoid collateral damage.

  • Subcutaneous Curvature: Follicles often have a hidden “J-hook” or “S-shape” beneath the skin, increasing transection risk if not approached correctly.

  • Denser Scalp Tissue: Offers more resistance, demanding specialized motor settings and extraction angles.

  • Aesthetic Standards: Hairline design and density goals often differ, requiring a tailored aesthetic approach.

How did your clinic address this clinical challenge?

Guided by the principle “First, do no harm,” we undertook a methodical research and development process.

  1. Recognition of Failure (2006-2007): Initial attempts using European techniques resulted in low graft survival and poor patient satisfaction, prompting us to pause all FUE services.

  2. Dedicated Research (2007-2008): We engaged in advanced global training and focused on understanding Asian follicular anatomy to identify the root causes of graft transection and poor yield.

  3. Technique Development & Publication (2008 onward): We successfully adapted the protocol and published our modified techniques in international journals and textbooks (e.g., Hair Transplant Forum International, 2009) to share knowledge and prevent other surgeons from repeating our early difficulties.

What is the result of this specialized approach?

The culmination of this work is a refined, high-precision surgical protocol.

  • FUE-HD (High-Density FUE): Our proprietary technique uses custom-sized punches and precise motor settings to navigate the unique curvature and density of Asian follicles, maximizing intact extraction.

  • Optimized for Natural Density: The method allows for safe, dense packing that meets the common aesthetic preference for fuller coverage among Asian patients.

  • Proven Track Record: Built on thousands of cases over 16+ years, providing reliable, natural-looking outcomes for the local population.

Why is it critical to choose a surgeon experienced with Asian hair?

The learning curve is significant. A surgeon unfamiliar with the nuances of Asian follicular anatomy is more likely to encounter:

  • Higher Transection Rates: Damaging the precious, finite donor grafts.

  • Suboptimal Yield: Harvesting fewer usable grafts than planned.

  • Unsatisfactory Aesthetics: Creating a hairline or density that appears unnatural for the patient’s ethnicity.

Key Takeaways

  • Asian Hair is Anatomically Distinct: Successful FUE requires specific adaptations for thicker, curlier follicles and denser scalp tissue not typically addressed in standard protocols.

  • A History of Pioneering Adaptation: Our clinic pioneered and published modified FUE techniques for Asian patients after initial failures with European methods, establishing a foundation for regional practice.

  • Specialized Technique Matters: Our FUE-HD protocol is engineered from the ground up for Asian patient characteristics, prioritizing graft survival and natural density.

  • Experience is Non-Negotiable: Given the technical complexity, choosing a surgical team with extensive, documented experience in Asian FUE is critical to protecting your donor supply and achieving a satisfactory result.

Original Article - Follicular Unit Extraction Experience in the Chinese population

Published in : ISHRS FORUM International. Vol 19:1, Jan/Feb 2009

Introduction

In1988 Masumi Inaba in Japan introduced the use of 1mm punch in extracting individual follicular unit. In 2002 Rassman refined the procedure and named it Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) or FOX procedure (FOllicular unit eXtraction). FUE serves as an alternative other than strip in donor harvesting (1). It attracts attention of those who desire hair transplantation but are turned off by a linear donor scar.

Being a blind technique, the number of grafts is limited by a high transection rate. Over the years many different FUE techniques have evolved to overcome this problem (2)(3)(4). A 5-steps personal approach will be described in part one of this chapter.  

The real problem of FUE however is the depletion of donor grafts for future sessions. Part two will outline the considerations when offering FUE mega-session to those Asian subgroups who have a low hair density and low hair-to-graft ratio (e.g. Chinese, Japanese, Thai) (5,6).

Fig 1. Identation
Fig 2. Scoring
Fig 3. Extraction
Fig 4. Placing the grafts on wet dressing
Fig 5. Extraction too closed to each other
Fig 6. FUE can leave patchy donor scars

Part I : Personal FUE Technique

1.1. Instrument

FUE Round Punch 0.75 to 0.8mm should be reserved for 1-hair FU. Size 1.0mm can be used for most 2- and 3-hair grafts. Larger 1.2mm punch, with a potential to leave scar and transect adjacent follicles, should be avoided (1).

Vari-handle is recommended as punch holder for 3 reasons

  1. A blocked punch will create buried grafts. Tissue debris can be irrigated out through the slot of the handle.
  2. Depth control of the punch can be set
  3. The weight and length of the handle helps to control the tip on scoring.

Curved forceps provides a larger contact area for a better grip of graft. A second pair of straight forceps is needed for difficult extraction.

Surgical loupes provides good visualization.

Magnification higher than 2X may cause more

eye-strain.

Moist dressing material instead of gloved finger should be used to collect extracted grafts (Fig 4) before transferring to a Petri-dish with cool saline (7).

1.2. Preoperative preparation

Grey or white hair should be colored before surgery. FOX test has been advocated for patient selection especially in megasession (8). In real practice it is rather time-consuming and unreliable. What initially appears to be difficult may turn out to be easy extraction after the surgeon adapts the technique to cater for the angle and direction of the follicles. The entire donor site should be trimmed leaving behind 0.3-0.5cm of hair above the skin to guide the punch. Those reluctant to shave must have kept hair long enough to cover one or two trimmed windows.

Scalp laxity should be assessed (9). Very tight scalp alerts the possibility of underlying idiopathic tissue fibrosis which necessitates deeper scoring.

1.3. Positions

Patient’s comfort must be ensured as FUE takes many hours. The patient should lie in a prone position with the surgeon sitting either by the side or at the end of the table.

Inspect the hair at the occiput and parietal areas. The surgeon should start at an easy area to gain confidence.

The patient’s neck should be flexed when harvesting the inferior donor area. Here the hair usually exits at flat angle and stretching the scalp helps to erect the follicles.

1.4. Marking the FUE donor area

The ‘safe margins’ of the donor area should be marked to avoid picking up non-permanent hair. There is no fixed rule in defining the safe donor areas. However Unger and Alt’s recommendations may be used as guideline (10).

Looking for grafts at the end of procedure is frustrating. One practical tip is to divide the marked donor area into small blocks of similar sizes.

N = The planned number of grafts

= The number of blocks

N / n = The number of grafts to be harvested per block.

If this number cannot be obtained in a defined block, the surgeon should prepare to expand the donor area or accept lesser grafts.

1.5. Local anaesthesia & tumescence

L.A. of personal choice should be injected below and along the inferior border.   Tumescence should not be injected as routine. The ease of extraction must first be tested with and without tumescence. It should be injected intra-dermally a small area at a time, and away from ‘holes’ to avoid spilling.

Graft selection

  • From personal experience a random approach may obtains more multi-FU grafts than an orderly approach in extraction.
  • All healthy looking multi-FUs within a block should first be randomly extracted. On the second round 1-hair grafts are extracted.
  • One rule must be followed: those grafts next to an empty hole should be spared.

Part 2 : The 5-Steps approach

Straighforward FUE requires only 2 steps – scoring and extraction (11). When extraction is difficult with high transection, a 5-steps approach is necessary.

Step 1 : Identation

  • The sharp tip of the punch may slip and transect the underside of the follicle. It should be secured on the skin surface before scoring.
  • After containing the hairs of a FU, the punch is positioned vertically on the skin surface.
  • It is then pushed downward to create an indentation on the skin, which in return embraces the punch ( Fig 1 ).

Step 2 : Sharp scoring

  • The angle of the punch is changed to align with the hair.
  • The handle is rotated to-and-fro with the thumb, index, and middle fingers to advance the punch.
  • Scoring should stop when tissue resistance is felt. This usually occurs on cutting the Arector pili at the isthmus (12).
  • Beyond this point the tissue will suddenly give way so that the punch may drop too deep and transect the roots ( Fig 2 ).

Step 3 : Test extraction

Single forceps technique –
  • One common problem encountered in extraction is “de-capping” – by just grasping a small amount of tissue the skin only is removed without the follicle.
  • The tips of the curved forceps are opened, placed around the dissected follicle, and passed down upon the surrounding skin.
  • The exposed upper dermis of the popped up follicle is then grasped firmly by the same forceps.
  • The graft is ‘pushed’ rather than ‘pulled’ out by pronating the wrist ( Fig 3 ).
Double forceps technique –
  • If de-capping still occurs, the follicle is first held and lifted by the curve forceps as described.
  • A second pair of straight forceps is positioned below the curve forceps to grasp lower and extract the graft.
  • This step can be performed by an assistant.
  • Any de-capped graft should be left behind. Struggle to remove may create a buried graft.
  • There is a learning curve for each case. The first 15 to 30 minutes should be spent patiently to test the proper angle, direction, and depth of the punch.
  • Successful extraction requires no further action but if the graft fails to come out, the next two steps becomes necessary

Steps 4 and 5 : Deep dissection and re-extraction

Three different tools can be used to free the follicle from any deep tethering before re-extraction.

  1. Using Dr Harris’ dull punch (4)(13);
  2. Using a sharp needle tip as recommended by Dr. Rassman (11);
  3. Using the same punch to cut deeper but with a lesser force and speed.

These two steps are repeated until the graft is removed.

Part 3 : FUE mega-session : special considerations in the Chinese populations

For these population the difficulties in FUE usually arises from a discrepancy between high demand (14)(15)(16)(17) and low supply of donor hair (5)(6). There are two ways to increase the number of grafts but at a higher risk for complications:

  1. By expanding the harvesting area into unsafe zones;
  2. By extracting more hair per sq.cm.

3.1 Complications

  1. Non-permanent hair is picked up by harvesting non-safe area.
  2. FUE prevents a linear scar but it is not a scarless technique (1). As a larger area is utilized the cumulative scarring of open wounds is in fact significantly greater than from a linear incision.
  3. Empty spots, snail-tracks, and mottling occur when adjacent follicles are extracted (Fig 5, 6). These are more visible in Asians with high hair-scalp color contrast.
  4. Thinning occurs due to the selective extraction of 2-3 hair FUs in a low density donor area (18). Any underlying scars or mottling becomes more obvious.
  5. Depletion of donor density leading to a wider scar if strip is required for subsequent sessions.

3.2 Advantages of FUE

  1. One doctor and 1-2 assistants can run a center. 2. The procedure is less traumatic and less surgical experience is required.
  2. Grafts preparation is minimal requiring less equipment.
  3. Less postoperative discomfort for the patient and no need to remove sutures.
  4. Minimal scarring if only a limited number is harvested

3.3 Indications for FUE

  1. Removal of unwanted grafts
  2. Selective extraction of single hair FUs for eyebrow or eyelash transplant
  3. When only a small number of grafts is required and further strips excision is not anticipated.
  4. When patients do not accept a linear donor scar.

3.4 Poor candidates for FUE

  1. When the patient does not care about donor scar.
  2. When future strip is anticipated to complete the job e.g. the very young patient with early Class III.
  3. Patient with a limited budget but require the maximum in one session

References

  1. Gökrem S, Baser NT, Aslan G Follicular unit extraction in hair transplantation: personal experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2008: Feb;60(2):127-33
  2. Lorenzo J. FUE: Tools vs Skill. Abstract: ISHRS 15th Annual Scientific Meeting. Las Vegas 2007
  3. Rassman W. Harris J. Bernstein R. “Follicular Unit Extraction” in Haber & Stough: Hair transplantation. Elsevier Saunders. 2006. Chapter 17, p133-142
  4. Harris JA. New methodology and instrumentation for follicular unit extraction: lower follicle transection rates and expanded patient candidacy. Dermatol Surg. 2006 Jan;32(1):56-61; discussion 61-2. Comment in: Dermatol Surg. 2006 Apr;32(4):599.
  5. Pathomvanich D. A Random Study of Asian Male Androgenic Alopecia in Bangkok, Thailand. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:804-807
  6. Tsai RY, Lee SH, Chan HL. The distribution of follicular units in the Chinese scalp: implications for reconstruction of natural-appearing hairlines in Orientals. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Jun;28(6):500-3.
  7. Cooley J. “Achieving Optimal Growth” in Haber & Stough: Hair transplantation. Elsevier Saunders. 2006. Chapter 14:p.111-116
  8. Bernstein R, Rassman W, Anderson K. FUE Megasessions—Evolution of a Technique. HT Forum International. May/June 2004; 14 (3), 97-99
  9. Mayer M. Scalp Elasticity Scale. HT Forum International. July/August 2005 Volume 15, Number 4
  10. Unger W. Cole J. “The Donor Area” in Unger & Shapiro: Hair Transplantation 4th edition. Marcel Dekker. 2004. Chapter 10A. p.301-304
  11. Rassman W. Harris J. Bernstein R. “Follicular Unit Extraction” in Haber & Stough: Hair transplantation. Elsevier Saunders. 2006. Chapter 17, p133-142
  12. Poblet E. Ortega F. Jimenez F. The Arrector Pili Muscle and the Follicular Unit of the scalp: A Microscopic Anatomy Study. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:800-903
  13. Harris J. FUE: Potential Pitfalls, problems, and Remedies. Abstract: ISHRS 15th Annual Scientific Meeting. Las Vegas 2007
  14. Pathomvanich D. “Hair Transplant in Asian” in Haber & Stough: Hair transplantation. Elsevier Saunders. 2006. Chapter 20, p149-156
  15. Bernstein RM, Rassman WR. The aesthetics of follicular transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 1997 Sep;23(9):785-99.
  16. Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Levin LS, Forrest CR. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;26(1):64-9.
  17. Beehner M. A Frontal Forelock/Central Density Framework for Hair Transplantation. Dermatol Surg 1997;23:807-815
  18. Jimenez F. Ruifernandez. Distribution of Human Hair in Follicular Units. A mathematical Model of Estimating the Donor Size in Follicular Unit Transplantation. Dermatol Surg 1999:25:294-298
36

MEDICAL - DISCLAIMERS

Images & Information shown are for reference only

Information on this website is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute personalized medical advice. It is not intended to promote our service or imply superiority over another.

Individual results in hair restoration vary significantly and no outcome can be guaranteed. The before-and-after images shown represent possible results — not promises. We recommend seeking independent medical advice to discuss your options … Read More

Paragraph

Pre-Consultation Review

Ensure You're a Good Candidate for hair transplant

Why pay for a consultation if you’re not a candidate? Start with our free WhatsApp assessment — the first step in our ‘No-Regret’ protocol to see if hair transplant is a realistic solution for your hair loss.

Still Have Questions ?

If you want to get a personalized answer from our medical team, you can reach us using this form here. We will cantact you as soon as possible.

Our Quality & Safety Standards

Our practice adheres to guidelines established by leading international organizations in Hair Restoration.

ISHRS

International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery is the leading global medical association that establishes international practice standards and patient safety protocols.

ABHRS

The American Board of Hair restoration Surgery represents the highest standard. To maintain rigorous certification requirements the physician must demonstrate surgical expertise.

WFI

Worls FUE InstituteI serves as the premier educational body focused exclusively on Follicular Unit Extraction methodology. The institute ensures consistent application of safe FUE.

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.